WhatsApp Available data has shown that at least 15 per cent of Nigerian food exports are rejected at the international market due to some food quality and safety issues.
This article presents findings from the Health Equity Collaborative Evaluation and Implementation Project, which assessed community and stakeholder perceptions of health equity for 3 NC-CTG strategies: Methods In a triangulated qualitative evaluation, 6 photo elicitation PE sessions among 45 community members in 1 urban and 3 rural counties and key informant interviews among 22 stakeholders were conducted.
Nine participants from the PE sessions and key informant interviews in the urban county subsequently participated in a stakeholder power analysis and mapping session SPA to discuss and identify people and organizations in their community perceived to be influential in addressing health equity—related issues.
Results Evaluations of the PE sessions and key informant interviews indicated that access convenience, cost, safety, and awareness of products and services and community fit community-defined quality, safety, values, and norms were important constructs across the strategies. The SPA identified specific community- and faith-based organizations, health care organizations, and local government agencies as key stakeholders for future efforts.
Conclusions Both community fit and access are essential constructs for promoting health equity. Findings demonstrate the feasibility of and need for formative research that engages community members and local stakeholders to shape context-specific, culturally relevant health promotion strategies.
Modifiable burdens of these diseases are often greater in rural counties or counties with high rates of poverty, poor access to health care, and high proportions of people of color 2. Effective interventions are needed at the institutional, organizational, system, and policy levels for sustainable change, especially among groups that are disproportionately affected by health disparities 3.
To design and implement such interventions, it is important to understand the issues and perspectives of community members 4. Using a unique, triangulated evaluation approach, we assessed community member and stakeholder perceptions of 3 NC-CTG strategies: The primary evaluation question was: How do residents from urban and rural counties perceive health equity in terms of farmers markets, shared use agreements, and smoke-free policies in multiunit housing?
The primary hypothesis was that there would be differences in health equity perceptions between urban and rural county residents. This article presents the overall findings from this evaluation.
Top Methods To improve health and prevent chronic diseases at the community level, the national CTG Program provided implementation and capacity-building support to awardees across the United States. Intervention areas included healthy eating, active living, tobacco-free living, and clinical and community preventive services to prevent and control high blood pressure and high cholesterol.
Strategies were to adhere to CTG principles: The framework included a communication plan for sharing information with DPH-CDI and the strategy-specific evaluation teams 6orientation of the evaluation teams to culturally competent evaluation readiness at the request of NC-CTG state staff 7and a health equity evaluation plan 8.
The evaluation plan included 3 qualitative approaches: The approach was designed to evaluate health equity perceptions across all 3 strategies in 1 urban county and 1 strategy each in 3 rural counties year 1across all 3 strategies in 1 rural county and 1 strategy each in 3 urban counties year 2and collectively across all participating rural and urban counties year 3.
The evaluation for year 1 was successfully completed by September This evaluation included 1 urban county Gaston and 3 rural counties Lee, farmers markets; Scotland, shared use; and Montgomery, smoke-free multiunit housing.
The PE target sample was 60 community members 6 sessions, 10 per session residing in 1 of 4 participating counties.
The key informant interview target sample was 24 stakeholders residing or working in one of the participating counties. The original SPA target sample was 30 people 2 sessions, 15 per session across the 4 counties who also participated in PE sessions or as a key informant.
For PE, community members attended an informational meeting, completed an informed consent and demographic survey, and received a disposable camera used and subsequently mailed to HECEPP staff. Approximately 3 weeks later, they returned to review their photos and collectively select, describe, and title the 5 photos they felt best reflected health equity issues in their community.
They responded to focus group questions on experiences related to the selected photos, including people, places, and things perceived to have the greatest impact on health disparities and health equity in their communities and what can maximize health equity.
Key informants each signed an informed consent and demographic survey, and participated in a to minute phone interview. All sessions were audio-recorded and transcribed.
Separate codebooks were created to analyze data from PE sessions and key informant interviews.
For PE analysis, HECEPP staff developed the codebook iteratively, focusing on what participants said about each strategy specifically and what they described collectively as influencing health equity. To ensure intercoder reliability, HECEPP staff worked together to apply codes to 2 transcripts and compared others that were coded independently, discussing discrepancies before individually completing coding.
This project was approved by the institutional review board at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Top Results PE participants had a mean age of Methods. We conducted surveys with patients and 66 semi-structured interviews with providers and other stakeholders prior to implementation of the HIEs to assess concerns about confidentiality in the electronic sharing of patient data.
One of the first steps in project management planning is the identification of stakeholders. In order to accomplish this, you need to understand what a stakeholder is.
Loosely defined, a stakeholder is a person or group of people who can affect or be affected by a given project. Stakeholders can be individuals working on a. 1. Introduction This section of the Stakeholder Management Strategy should introduce and discuss the goals and objectives of the Stakeholder Management Strategy for the project.
Effectively managing stakeholders is a key component of successful project management and should never be ignored. Proper stakeholder management can be used to gain support for a project and anticipate. To determine the acceptability and viability of implementing the HBP, a stakeholder analysis was conducted to identify the knowledge, positions, and available resources for the package.
The results revealed that the private health sector, having the most resources, is least in favor of implementing the package, whereas the political and civil society sectors support implementation.
Key factors positively influencing the acceptability of akokono as a complementary food were familiarity with the consumption of akokono by the primary caregiver and health worker endorsement of akokono. I conducted key-stakeholder and focus group interviews that focused on the attitudes and perceptions informing expressed attitudes about using forest residuals as feedstock for biofuels production.
Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using deductive and .