Preferred abstract submission software:
There are three additional practical reasons to present at a national meeting. First, having something accepted for presentation is often the only way your department will reimburse your trip to the meeting.
Second, going through the work of abstract submission and presentation helps tremendously in manuscript preparation. It provides a deadline and forces you to organize your thoughts, analyze your data, and place them in an understandable format.
This makes the eventual job of writing the manuscript much less daunting. Third, presenting also allows you to get immediate feedback, which can then make the manuscript stronger before it is submitted.
Such feedback often gives the presenter additional ideas for analyses, alternate explanations for findings, and ideas regarding future directions. Although these personal and practical reasons for presenting are derived from our own experiences, they are concordant with the survey results of presenters at the Society of General Internal Medicine Annual Meeting.
For example, for these presenters, posters were preferred for getting feedback and criticism and for networking and collaborating. Oral presentations, on the other hand, were preferred for developing a national reputation and sharing important findings most effectively.
For all of these reasons, many academic centers have developed highly effective programs for trainees and junior faculty to help encourage submissions 1011 so it is wise to seek out such programs if they exist in your home institution.
Getting Started Realizing the importance of presenting at national meetings may be the easy part. Actually getting started and putting together a submission is where most fall short. The critical first step is to pick something that interests you. For original research, hopefully your level of interest was a consideration at the beginning of the project, although how anxious you are to work on the submission may be a good barometer for your true investment in the project.
For case studies, make sure the topic, and ideally the case, fuel a passion.
Unlike original research, in which mentors and advisors are usually established at study conception, case studies often require you to seek appropriate collaborators when contemplating submission.
It is the rare submission that comes from a single author. In choosing collaborators, look for a senior mentor with experience submitting posters and an investment in both you and the topic.
There is nothing more disheartening for the junior clinician than having to harass a mentor whose heart is not in the project. Another critical step is to choose the right meeting for the submission.
Although many submissions may be to palliative care meetings e. Presentations at well-recognized nonpalliative care meetings further legitimize the field, increase your national visibility, and lead to interesting and fruitful collaborations.
Additionally, these types of presentations may be looked on with more favor by people reviewing your CV who are not intimately familiar with the world of palliative care. Table 1 presents some questions you should discuss with your mentor and ask yourself when choosing a meeting.
Some of these questions may have conflicting answers, and you should be thoughtful in weighing what is most important. Check requirements regarding what material can be presented.
For example, many meetings will allow you to present data that were already presented at a regional meeting but not data that were previously presented at another national meeting.
Most meetings also do not allow you to present data that are already published, although it is generally acceptable to submit your abstract at the same time you submit your paper for publication. If the paper is published before the meeting, make sure to inform the committee—most often you will still be able to present but will be asked to note the publication in your presentation.
Regarding the submission, most conferences have very specific instructions and the rules are strict. The applications are generally online with preset fields and word limits. It is helpful to examine review criteria and deadlines for submission, paying particular attention to time zones. Finally, it can be invaluable to read published abstracts from the last meeting and to talk with prior presenters to get a sense of the types of abstracts that are accepted.
The next step is to start writing. The key to success is to leave enough time as there are often unavoidable and unplanned technical issues with the online submission that you will confront.
Most submissions require several rewrites. These can become frustrating, but it is important to realize that there is a very specific language for these types of submissions that your mentor should know and that you will learn over time. The most common issue is the need to shorten the abstract to fit the word limit.The Abstract Writing and Poster Development for International Meetings course was requested by participants of the previous SWM Program activities, including SWM Program mentorship sessions that were held through July-October , and Annual BTRP-UA One Health Research Symposiums.
Workplace health and well-being should be a part of the overall company strategy for a healthy workplace. Health and safety legislation and other workplace policies or programs can provide a basis for a workplace health (or health promotion) program.
All authors must disclose the presence or absence of conflict of interest with companies related to their presentation.
If the authors have any conflict of interest to disclose, the category and company names should be described after the authors' names in the second slide or at the end of the poster, as shown in the example below.
A poster session is a hall where researchers put up a posters describing their work. The cool part is that one of the researchers will be hanging out at each poster and you can just go up and talk to them. Moderated Poster Sessions Thank you for your participation as a moderated poster speaker at the AUA Annual Meeting.
A poster session is designed to permit the author to explain and illustrate his/her concepts, techniques or research findings in a manner that will promote understanding more readily than does a "rapid fire" podium address.
Creative and abstract thinking skills to envision and design innovative solutions to business opportunities and challenges Proven ability to work independently; designing, developing and deploying solutions, and to deliver projects on time with minimal direction.